Search for: "Morgan Stanley Dean Witter and Co" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2021, 1:04 pm by Tom Smith
He was vice president for corporate security at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. and a jumbo jet had just plowed into the other tower.As smoke rose from Tower One, someone from the Port Authority ordered him to keep his people at their desks. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 7:02 am by Zamansky LLC
In 1997, Morgan Stanley acquired two businesses from Sears—Dean Witter and Discover Card. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:02 pm
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., No. 27 In an action for tortious interference with contract, the trial court’s order denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint is reversed, where Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations, with the exception of Plaintiff’s unjust [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 4:41 pm
A recent shake-up at the firm was designed to stem the tide of problems which had surfaced during the past decade since that firm bought Dean Witter Securities. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Alan Rosca
  Michael Carter was also registered with Morgan Stanley & Co Incorporated between April 2007 and June 2009. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There is no single statute of limitations for causes of action alleging breach of fiduciary duty (see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139; Matter of Hersh, 198 AD3d [*2]766, 769). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the appellant's counterclaims against those defendants were time-barred (see CPLR 213[1], [7]; 214[4], [6]; IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139; North Fork Preserve, Inc. v Kaplan, 31 AD3d 403, 405). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To determine timeliness, we consider whether plaintiff’s complaint must, as a matter of law, be read to allege damages suffered so early as to render the claim time-barred” IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132,139 [2009]. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” As such, we find no abuse of discretion in Supreme Court’s determination that a three-year limitations period applies to defendant’s breach of fiduciary duty claim, which seeks purely monetary relief (see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the breach of fiduciary duty causes of action, “where an allegation of fraud is essential to a breach of fiduciary duty claim, courts have applied a six-year statute of limitations under CPLR 213 (8)” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009], rearg denied 12 NY3d 889 [2009]; see Monaghan v Ford Motor Co., 71 AD3d 848, 849-850 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They state a claim for malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty–both of which have a three-year statute of limitations because defendants exclusively seek monetary damages (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]; Matter of R.M Kliment & Frances Hals band, Architects, 3 NY3d 538, 541 [2004]). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 4:33 am by Alan Rosca
He then switched to Dean Witter Reynolds located in Purchase, New York from May 1992 until June 1999. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 4:33 am by Alan Rosca
He then switched to Dean Witter Reynolds located in Purchase, New York from May 1992 until June 1999. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009).) [read post]